False Rape Case? IPL Cricketer Abishek Porel Gets Bail After Arrest & A Month In Jail In Case Filed By Medical Student
Curated by NEWS DESK
Editorial DeskKOLKATA: Delhi Capitals cricketer Abishek Porel has been granted bail by a Chinsurah court in a case involving allegations of rape and criminal intimidation made by a medical student. The bail came after the 23-year-old cricketer spent a little over a month in custody.
Police arrested Porel on August 11, 2026, after a complaint filed by a medical student from Karnataka. According to the complainant, she and Porel had been in a relationship for more than three years and had also travelled abroad together. She alleged that the relationship began on a promise of marriage.
The woman alleged that differences later developed between them and that Porel distanced himself and refused to marry her. She further alleged that when she travelled to Delhi to meet him on April 2, she was assaulted, confined and denied food. She also accused him of threatening to make their intimate photographs public. These remain allegations and have not been established by a criminal court.
The matter had earlier reached the Calcutta High Court, which directed the police to arrest Porel and seize his electronic devices. The direction also aimed to prevent alleged private material concerning the complainant from being circulated. Police later confiscated a pen drive and sent it for forensic examination.
After his arrest, police produced Porel before the Chinsurah court. The court initially rejected his bail plea, and he was first remanded to police custody before being sent to 14 days of judicial custody. The proceedings therefore kept the young cricketer away from liberty for more than a month before bail was ultimately granted.
Porel has denied the allegations against him. Granting bail does not decide whether the allegations are true or false. The criminal case and investigation remain separate from the question of his release from custody.
Reports concerning the FIR indicate that it invokes provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section 69 BNS, which deals with sexual intercourse by deceitful means or a promise to marry made without intention of fulfilling it, is among the provisions reported in connection with the case. Other allegations concern intimidation, cheating and electronic/private material.
The latest order releases Porel on bail after more than a month behind bars, but does not end the criminal proceedings. The allegations will still have to be tested through investigation and the legal process, where the prosecution must establish the offences alleged against him under the law.
EXPLANATORY TABLE OF LAWS AND SECTIONS
| Law / Section | What It Means | Relevance To The Case |
|---|---|---|
| Section 69, BNS | Deals with sexual intercourse by deceitful means or by a promise to marry made without intention of fulfilling that promise, where the act does not amount to rape. | Reported as one of the provisions invoked after the complainant alleged a physical relationship based on a promise of marriage. |
| Section 311, BNS | Deals with robbery or dacoity accompanied by an attempt to cause death or grievous hurt. | Reported by subsequent coverage as one of the provisions registered in the case. The linked TOI bail report itself does not explain the factual basis for this section. |
| Section 318, BNS | Deals with cheating and its different forms. | Reported among the provisions invoked in the criminal case. |
| Section 66, Information Technology Act | Provides punishment for specified computer-related offences involving acts referred to under Section 43 when done dishonestly or fraudulently. | Electronic devices and digital material have formed part of the investigation, but the TOI bail report does not explain how this provision applies in fact. |
| Section 72, Information Technology Act | Deals with breach of confidentiality and privacy in circumstances covered by the provision. | Relevant to the allegations concerning private/intimate material and the investigation into electronic devices. |
CASE DETAILS
| Particular | Details |
|---|---|
| Accused | Abishek Porel, 23-year-old cricketer |
| Complainant | Medical student from Karnataka |
| Police Station | Mogra Police Station, Hooghly, West Bengal |
| Nature of Case | Criminal case involving allegations of rape and other offences |
| Date of Arrest | 11 August 2026 |
| Initial Bail Status | First bail plea was rejected |
| Custody Period | Porel remained in custody for over one month |
| Bail Court | Chinsurah Court, Hooghly |
| Connected High Court | Calcutta High Court |
| Connected High Court Case | X v. State of West Bengal |
| High Court Bench | Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya |
| High Court Proceeding Concerned | Earlier proceedings relating to Porel’s arrest and investigation |
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- A complaint put Abishek Porel behind bars for over a month before the allegations against him were proved in court.
- His first bail plea was rejected. A 23-year-old man lost his liberty while the case was still at the allegation and investigation stage.
- Porel denied the allegations, but the damage had already begun: arrest, jail and his name publicly attached to a serious criminal case.
- An arrest is not a conviction. An accusation is not evidence of guilt. Yet for an accused man, punishment through custody and public stigma can begin long before any verdict.
- This is why presumption of innocence matters for men too. If a man spends weeks behind bars before guilt is established, getting bail later cannot give him those lost days, reputation or peace back.
Share Your Thoughts
Comments are moderated before publication.