Through Hrithik Roshanâs case and a recent Delhi High Court ruling, we explore how alimony has turned from support for the needy into entitlement for the privileged. The CelebrityâŚ
Precedent analyses on Section 498A IPC, Section 125 CrPC & BNSS safeguards
A husband secures divorce after years of marital disputes, but must still pay âš36.25 lakh as permanent alimony. Why did the Patna High Court impose this financial obligationâŚ
Through Hrithik Roshanâs case and a recent Delhi High Court ruling, we explore how alimony has turned from support for the needy into entitlement for the privileged. The CelebrityâŚ
In a landmark judgment, the court held that no parent has an exclusive right over a child and that alienating a father from his son amounts to mental cruelty â a crucial precedentâŚ
Cricketer Yuzvendra Chahal took a cheeky dig at his ex-wife Dhanashree Verma after sharing a Delhi High Court ruling that said âfinancially independent wives cannot demandâŚ
The Orissa High Court has granted actor-politician Anubhav Mohanty a divorce holding that a wifeâs unilateral refusal to consummate the marriage without any valid reasonâŚ
The Gauhati High Court ruled that petty fights or divorce demands by a husband or his family donât amount to cruelty under Section 498A IPC. The Court quashed the entire caseâŚ
The Calcutta High Court quashed a wifeâs criminal case under Section 498A IPC and other laws, ruling that expecting an educated, earning wife to contribute to household expensesâŚ
The Supreme Court has overturned the Himachal Pradesh High Courtâs ruling that gave tribal daughters inheritance rights under the Hindu Succession Act, stating that no CentralâŚ
Bombay High Court Rejects Wifeâs Plea: The Bombay High Court has ruled that when both husband and wife file separate divorce petitions in different courts, the second petitionâŚ
Delhi High Court ruled that permanent alimony canât be granted just to equalise wealth when both spouses are financially independent. The bench dismissed a senior officerâs pleaâŚ
