Select a page

JAIVIR Vs. SANTOSH

Judgement

 
Court:PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Bench: JUSTICE V.K. Bali

JAIVIR Vs. SANTOSH On 14 February 1995

Law Point:
Default in paying maintenance allowance — Warrant of arrest cannot be issued as a matter of first resort — Resort prior in point of time, has to be made to attach property.

 

 

JUDGEMENT

 

It is true that by virtue of Section 125(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the judgment of this Court in Raj Kumar v. Smt. Krishna Kumari, 1984 (2) RCR 434=1984 (2) Ch.LR 396, warrant of arrest cannot be issued and the party defaulting in payment cannot be sent to civil imprisonment as a matter of first resort and that necessarily resort, prior in point of time, has to be made to attach the property. That, however, in peculiar facts of this case, cannot come to the rescue of petitioner. It is conceded that petitioner has no property so that the same could be put to auction with a view to provide maintenance to respondent-wife. There is persistent, default for paying the maintenance allowance to respondent-wife in the present case and remand of the case directing the Magistrate in first resort to proceedings of attachment would be an exercise in futility.

Petition dismissed.

DISCLAIMER: The above judgement is posted for informational purpose ONLY. Printout/ Copy from this website are not admissible citation in the Court of Law. For a court admissible copy contact your advocate.

You may contact me for legal consultation or advice by visiting Contact Us

If you have any query related to gender biased laws join SahodarWhatsapp Groups by sending Whatsapp message “Subscribe” to Sahodar Trust No. 9811850498

1 Comment

  1. Sandeep kumar January 30, 2018 Reply

    I am also facing domestic violence, 498,406, 125 mnt case against me.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.