Judgement

Court: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Bench: G.S. Singhvi, V. Gopala Gowda Ranjana Kumari vs State Of Uttaranchal & Ors on 23 September 2013 Law Point: Mere FIR registration does not mandate arrest; police must apply judicial mind and follow due procedure before making an arrest. JUDGEMENT G.S. SINGHVI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant has […]

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU Anand Kaushal vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 13 March, 2020 Law Point: Consent obtained for a physical relationship based on an unenforceable promise of marriage is not vitiated under misconception of fact. JUDGEMENT 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 01.08.2019 passed […]

Court: Madras High Court Bench: JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN Sathiyamoorthy vs The State Rep. By on 21 February, 2018 Law Point: If the investigation is almost complete, keeping the accused in jail for too long is unfair. The court granted bail. JUDGEMENT This appeal filed against the order of dismissal, dismissing the Crl.M.P.No.2960 of 2018 in Crime No.83 of 2018, […]

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA Parmanand Mishra & Anr vs The State Nct Of Delhi & Anr on 5 August, 2022 Law Point: Courts must strictly interpret statutory provisions and ensure litigants exhaust prescribed legal remedies instead of seeking extraneous judicial interventions. JUDGEMENT 1. This petition is filed for quashing of FIR No.24/2018 under Sections […]

Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: JUSTICE Arun Mishra Prathvi Raj Chauhan vs Union Of India on 10 February, 2020 Law Point: SC upheld Section 18-A of SC/ST Act, 2018, restricting anticipatory bail and eliminating preliminary inquiry for FIR and arrest. JUDGEMENT ARUN MISHRA, J. 1. The petitioners have questioned the provisions inserted by way of carving out […]

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU State vs Sandeep on 25 September, 2019 Law Point:  JUDGEMENT 1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. CRL.L.P. 532/2019 3. The State has filed the present petition seeking leave to appeal against a judgment dated 15.07.2019, passed by the learned Additional […]

Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV State vs Om Prakash & Ors on 29 July, 2022 Law Point: Framing charges requires prima facie evidence; breach of promise isn’t rape; post-marriage allegations weaken; vague cruelty claims don’t sustain 498A. JUDGEMENT 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application is disposed of accordingly. CRL.M.A. 12446/2022 (condonation […]

Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Bench: JUSTICE Subodh Abhyankar Sudhir Gupta vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 July, 2018 Law Point:  JUDGEMENT None appears for respondent No.2, though served. Heard on the present appeal which has been filed by the appellant under Section 14-A of Scheduled Castes and Sched- uled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015 […]

Court: Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Bench: JUSTICE  INDIRA BANERJEE Jayanti Rani Panda vs State Of West Bengal on 31 March, 2015 Law Point:  JUDGEMENT Leave is granted to the petitioner to correct the cause title as also the body of the application by rectifying the inadvertent error in the Sessions Trial case number and Police […]