Important court decisions for 498A, maintenance, domestic violence, custody, divorce and related legal strategy.
Court: High Court of Delhi Bench: JUSTICE Shiv Narayan Dhingra Manish Kumar vs Mrs. Pratibha on 18 September, 2008 Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Adv. For the appellant. Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Adv. For the respondent. Law Point: No maintenance to earning spouse, though her salary is lower than husband JUDGEMENT 1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has [β¦]
Court: Kerala High Court Bench: JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR Sunitha vs State Of Kerala on 10 December, 2010 SRI. A. T. ANILKUMAR, Adv. For the appellant. SRI. V. K. SUNIL, Adv. For the respondent. Law Point: Kerala HC accepts the easy misuse of DV to gain unfair advantage over husband. JUDGEMENT In this Revision filed under Section 397 read with Sec. 401 Cr.P.C. the Revision Petitioner [β¦]
Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: S.B. Sinha, Markandey Katju S.R. Batra And Anr vs Smt. Taruna Batra on 15 December, 2006 Law Point: Wife has no Right on Monther in Lawβs Property JUDGEMENT Leave granted. This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 17.1.2005 in C.M.M. No. [β¦]
Court: Supreme Court of India Bench: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, D.K. Jain Iqbal Bano vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 5 June, 2007 Law Point: Section 125 Cr.P.C.Proceedings under are civil in nature. JUDGEMENT 1. In the present appeal the appellant questions correctness of the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Allahabad [β¦]
Court: High Court Of Uttarakhand Bench: JUSTICE Dharam Veer Vikas Jain vs Smt. Deepali @ Ayushi Jain on 25 October, 2010 Law Point: No Maintenance u/s125Crpc for working Women JUDGEMENT This criminal revision has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 4.9.2002 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Haridwar in Case No. 66/2002, [β¦]
Every case is different. Book a consultation with Shonee Kapoor for specific, practical guidance.
