498a/406

Ram Nath Thakur Vs. State Of Bihar

Court: Patna High Court Bench: Birendra Prasad Verma, J. Ram Nath Thakur vs State Of Bihar on 26 March, 2011 Law Point: 498A after 2 years of husband filing divorce, granted bail JUDGEMENT The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a criminal prosecution, under Sections 498(A), 406 and494 of the Indian Penal Code as also 3/4 […]

Ram Nath Thakur Vs. State Of Bihar
498a/406 Shonee Kapoor

Ram Nath Thakur Vs. State Of Bihar

Shonee Kapoor, men's rights activist and legal consultant in India

Written and analysed by Shonee Kapoor

Legal Consultant, Author & Men's Rights Activist

Court: Patna High Court

Bench: Birendra Prasad Verma, J.

Ram Nath Thakur vs State Of Bihar on 26 March, 2011

Law Point:
498A after 2 years of husband filing divorce, granted bail

JUDGEMENT

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a criminal prosecution, under Sections 498(A), 406 and494 of the Indian Penal Code as also 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, based on complaint petition vide Annexure I.

It is submitted that as a matter of fact, in the year 2006 itself, the petitioner filed Matrimonial Case No. 146 of 2006 in the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur seeking divorce with the complainant. In that matrimonial case, opposite party no. 2 has entered appearance, and despite efforts made by the learned Principal Judge, the conciliation could not be arrived at between the parties. Thereafter, the complainant filed the present complaint case in the year 2008 in retaliation making all baseless and false allegations against the petitioner.

In view of the fact, the present complaint petition was filed after about two years from the date of filing of the matrimonial case and the conciliation proceeding has failed, in that background, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. C-638 of 2008 to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur (west), subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

DISCLAIMER: The above judgement is posted for informational purpose ONLY. Printout/ Copy from this website are not admissible citation in the Court of Law. For a court admissible copy contact your advocate.

You may contact me for consultation or advice by visiting Contact Us

Tags

498a/406 Judgement Bail 406 498a Bail court judgement shonee kapoor

Share

Shonee Kapoor, men's rights activist and legal consultant in India

Shonee Kapoor

Indian men's rights activist, legal consultant and author focused on matrimonial law, 498A, maintenance, child custody, parental alienation and gender-neutral laws. He is not an advocate or lawyer.

Share Your Thoughts

Comments are moderated before publication.