Judgement

Jaivir Vs. Santosh

Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Bench: JUSTICE V.K. Bali Jaivir Vs. Santosh On 14 February 1995 Law Point: Default in paying maintenance allowance — Warrant of arrest cannot be issued as a matter of first resort — Resort prior in point of time, has to be made to attach property. JUDGEMENT It is true […]

Jaivir Vs. Santosh
Judgement Shonee Kapoor

Jaivir Vs. Santosh

Shonee Kapoor, men's rights activist and legal consultant in India

Written and analysed by Shonee Kapoor

Legal Consultant, Author & Men's Rights Activist

Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Bench: JUSTICE V.K. Bali

Jaivir Vs. Santosh On 14 February 1995

Law Point:
Default in paying maintenance allowance — Warrant of arrest cannot be issued as a matter of first resort — Resort prior in point of time, has to be made to attach property.

JUDGEMENT

It is true that by virtue of Section 125(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the judgment of this Court in Raj Kumar v. Smt. Krishna Kumari, 1984 (2) RCR 434=1984 (2) Ch.LR 396, warrant of arrest cannot be issued and the party defaulting in payment cannot be sent to civil imprisonment as a matter of first resort and that necessarily resort, prior in point of time, has to be made to attach the property. That, however, in peculiar facts of this case, cannot come to the rescue of petitioner. It is conceded that petitioner has no property so that the same could be put to auction with a view to provide maintenance to respondent-wife. There is persistent, default for paying the maintenance allowance to respondent-wife in the present case and remand of the case directing the Magistrate in first resort to proceedings of attachment would be an exercise in futility.

Petition dismissed.

DISCLAIMER: The above judgement is posted for informational purpose ONLY. Printout/ Copy from this website are not admissible citation in the Court of Law. For a court admissible copy contact your advocate.

You may contact me for consultation or advice by visiting Contact Us

Tags

Judgement 125 Maintenance crpc 125 crpc125 Maintenance No Maintenance No Maintenance to Wife section 125

Share

Shonee Kapoor, men's rights activist and legal consultant in India

Shonee Kapoor

Indian men's rights activist, legal consultant and author focused on matrimonial law, 498A, maintenance, child custody, parental alienation and gender-neutral laws. He is not an advocate or lawyer.

Share Your Thoughts

Comments are moderated before publication.