Ines Miranda Vs. Santosh K Swamy
Written and analysed by Shonee Kapoor
Legal Consultant, Author & Men's Rights ActivistCourt:Ă‚Â Supreme Court of India
Equivalent citations: 2003 (1) AWC 344 SC, (2003) 2 CALLT 23 SC
Bench: JUSTICE DALVEER BHANDARI and JUSTICEĂ‚Â A.K. PATNAIK
INES MIRANDA vs SANTOSH K SWAMYĂ‚Â on 14/12/2009
Law Point:
TRANSFER PETITION – Payment to Husband
JUDGEMENT
The petitioner is seeking transfer of the case from Chennai to Bangalore. Her contention is that it is inconvenient for her to look after the case at Chennai because she is working in Bangalore and has a small child. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that it would not be inconvenient for the respondent-husband to prosecute the case in Bangalore as he is unemployed. The petitioner is directed to pay Rupees ten thousand as travelling expenses to the respondent since he is unemployed. Upon deposit of this amount, notice would be issued and the proceeding before the Trial Court shall be stayed.
DISCLAIMER: The above judgement is posted for informational purpose ONLY. Printout/ Copy from this website are not admissible citation in the Court of Law. For a court admissible copy contact your advocate.
You may contact me for consultation or advice by visiting Contact Us
Shonee Kapoor
Indian men's rights activist, legal consultant and author focused on matrimonial law, 498A, maintenance, child custody, parental alienation and gender-neutral laws. He is not an advocate or lawyer.
Related Reading
Artical & News Feeds
How To Handle Stridhan & Dowry-Article Recovery Without Making A Criminal Admission?
High Court
Marital Discord “Dragged” Into POSH Case? Allahabad High Court Questions Proceedings Against Husband, Stays Disciplinary Action
High Court
Delhi HC Questions: Why Does the BNS Rape Law Recognise Only Women as Victims? Who Will Protect Men or Transgender Persons Facing Sexual Violence?
High Court
Share Your Thoughts
Comments are moderated before publication.