498a/406

Ibnubin Shiyad Vs. The Sub Inspector Of Police

Court: Kerala High Court Bench: JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR Ibnubin Shiyad vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 1 March, 2007 SRI.M.K.ABOOBACKER, Adv. For the appellant. Public Prosecutor For the respondent. Law Point: Anticipatory bail in 498 A and 403 I.P.C JUDGEMENT In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the accused in Crime No.97/07 of Kalamassery Police Station for offences […]

Ibnubin Shiyad Vs. The Sub Inspector Of Police
498a/406 Shonee Kapoor

Ibnubin Shiyad Vs. The Sub Inspector Of Police

Shonee Kapoor, men's rights activist and legal consultant in India

Written and analysed by Shonee Kapoor

Legal Consultant, Author & Men's Rights Activist

Court: Kerala High Court

Bench: JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

Ibnubin Shiyad vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 1 March, 2007

SRI.M.K.ABOOBACKER, Adv. For the appellant.
Public Prosecutor For the respondent.

Law Point:
Anticipatory bail in 498 A and 403 I.P.C

JUDGEMENT

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the accused in Crime No.97/07 of Kalamassery Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 498A and 403 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioner on bail for a period of one month in the event of his arrest in connection with the above case on his executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the said officer and subject to the following conditions:

1. Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays. 2. The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.
3. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.
4. Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.
5. Petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile.

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

This application is allowed as above.

DISCLAIMER: The above judgement is posted for informational purpose ONLY. Printout/ Copy from this website are not admissible citation in the Court of Law. For a court admissible copy contact your advocate.

You may contact me for  consultation or advice by visiting Contact Us

Tags

498a/406 Judgement Bail 406 498a Bail court divorce dowry judgement men's rights shonee kapoor

Share

Shonee Kapoor, men's rights activist and legal consultant in India

Shonee Kapoor

Indian men's rights activist, legal consultant and author focused on matrimonial law, 498A, maintenance, child custody, parental alienation and gender-neutral laws. He is not an advocate or lawyer.

Share Your Thoughts

Comments are moderated before publication.