Category-wise judgments arranged for faster research and practical case preparation.
Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE Sunil Gaur Vikas Shukla vs Central Bureau Of Investigation & on 20 November, 2014 Law Point: Electronic record only admissible in evidence when it was in accordance with procedure prescribed under section 65B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 JUDGEMENT 1. In the above captioned two petitions, the challenge is […]
Court: Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE Sunil Gaur Vikas Shukla vs Central Bureau Of Investigation & on 20 November, 2014 Law Point: Electronic record only admissible in evidence when it was in accordance with procedure prescribed under section 65B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 JUDGEMENT 1. In the above captioned two petitions, the challenge is […]
Court: High Court Of Delhi Bench: JUSTICES Sanjiv Khanna and Justice R.K.gauba Kundan Singh vs The State on 24 November, 2015 Law Point: Provision under 22A of Indian Evidence Act to be only used when genuineness of electronic evidence is in question. CDRs used for Conviction. JUDGEMENT 1. In this appeal, Kundan Singh challenges judgment dated 18th […]
Court: Andhra High Court Equivalent citations: AIR 2008 AP 98, 2008 (2) ALD 311, 2008 (1) ALT 613 Bench: Justice B Nazki Rayala M. Bhuvaneswari vs Nagaphanender Rayala on 20 December, 2007 Law Point: Recording of private conversation between husband and wife infringement of Article 21 JUDGEMENT 1. After this revision was entertained, this Court, on […]
Court: Madras High Court Bench: JUSTICE A. Kulasekaran G. Shyamala Ranjini vs M.S. Tamizhnathan on 20 November 2007 Law Point: Admissibility of recording of mobile phone conversation on CD. Best evidence rule JUDGEMENT The respondent in HMOP No. 96 of 2004 on the file of Sub Court, Mettur, is the revision petitioner herein. The said HMOP […]
Every case is different. Book a consultation with Shonee Kapoor for specific, practical guidance.
