Whatsapp Message to Shonee Kapoor
  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • Address
  • Call For Help
  • +91-8010850498
X

About Me

Some years back, I was sucked into the labyrinth of Indian Matrimonial laws and a false 498a in particular. To be fair, before it hit me, it was difficult for me to fathom the wide spread misuse of dowry laws and specially 498a in India.

CONSULTATION

Contact Info

  • 362, II Floor, Kohat Enclave, Pitampura, Delhi 110034
  • +91-8010850498, +91-9990855750
  • info@shoneekapoor.com
Awesome Image

Judgement

POONAM KHANNA Vs. V.P. SHARMA & ANR.

Court:Delhi High Court Bench: JUSTICE Suresh Kait POONAM KHANNA Vs. V.P. SHARMA & ANR. On 30.1.2012 Law Point: Petitioner wife concealed material fact of her being employed and earning her livelihood. Interim Maintenance set aside. JUDGEMENT   Instant petition is being filed under Section 482, Cr.P.C. against the impugned order dated 29.7.2010 passed by learned […]

Read More

Anil Kumar Pradhan Vs. Madhabi Pradhan

Court:CUTTACK HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE Krushna Mohapatra Anil Kumar Pradhan Vs. Madhabi Pradhan On 15 October 2015 Law Point: Child had become compatible to surroundings and situations where she has been staying. Dislocation of child from place where she has grown-up would not only impede her schooling, but also cause emotional strain and depression on […]

Read More

Rameshwar @ Pappu & Ors. Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Ors.

Court: RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE Sunil Kumar Garg RAMESHWAR @ PAPPU & ORS. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. On 22.1.2001 Law Point: Settlement and Understanding Between Spouses to Amicably Live Together with Harmony: Permission to Compound Offence Granted. JUDGEMENT This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the accused petitioners under Section 482, […]

Read More

Kiran Tulshiram Ingale Vs. Anupama P. Gaikwad And Ors.

Court: Bombay High Court Bench: JUSTICE D Deshpande, S Bobde Kiran Tulshiram Ingale vs Anupama P. Gaikwad And Ors. on 25 July, 2006 Law Point: The criminal proceedings against Husband so also his conviction quashed in view of the mutual understanding, divorce and compromise between Husband and Wife. JUDGEMENT 1. Heard advocates for the petitioner […]

Read More

Durg Vijai Yadav Vs. State Of U.p. & Anr.

Court: ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE Jayashree Tiwari DURG VIJAI YADAV Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ANR. On 29 August 2012 Law Point: Grant of Maintenance — From date of filing application. Express orders are necessary and no special reasons are required to be recorded by Court. JUDGEMENT   Case called out in the revised […]

Read More

Bhausaheb @ Sandu S/o Raghuji Vs. Leelabai W/o Bhausaheb Magar

Court: Bombay High Court Bench: JUSTICE N Dabholkar, A Naik, N Patil N.P. ABU Vs. VELLAM THOTTIL ASMA & ORS. On 26 August 1998 Law Point: No Permanent Alimony in Sec 11, Permanent Alimony may be asked in sec 12. JUDGEMENT 1. While considering Family Court Appeal No. 12/2003, Bhausaheb v. Leelabai, a Division Bench […]

Read More

B.P. Achala Anand Vs. S. Appi Reddy & Anr

Court:Supreme Court of India Bench: JUSTICE CJI, G.P. Mathur, P.K. Balasubramanyan B.P. Achala Anand vs S. Appi Reddy & Anr on 11 February, 2005 Law Point: Right to Residence after Divorce to be decided based on Divorce Terms. JUDGEMENT   Unusual fact situation posing issues for resolution is an opportunity for innovation. Law, as administered […]

Read More

Bhavana N. Shah Vs. Nitin Chimanlal Shah

Court: BOMBAY HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE A.M. Khanwilkar & A.R. Joshi BHAVANA N. SHAH Vs. NITIN CHIMANLAL SHAH On 21 June 2012 Law Point: False, frivolous and unsubstantiated allegations against husband of having illicit relations with his sisters — No contemporaneous evidence produced by wife to corroborate her version — It was clearly an attempt […]

Read More

Smt. Sona vs Karambir

Court: Punjab-Haryana High Court Bench: JUSTICE S Saksena Smt. Sona vs Karambir on 15 March, 1995 Law Point: Wife is not able to discharge her marital obligations. Evident that it has become impossible for the Husband to reside with the her. Divorce granted. JUDGEMENT 1. Appellant wife has filed the appeal under Section 28 of […]

Read More

PRAVEEN MEHTA Vs. INDERJIT MEHTA

Court:SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Bench: JUSTICE D.P. Mohapatra & Brijesh Kumar PRAVEEN MEHTA Vs. INDERJIT MEHTA On 11 July 2002 Law Point: Denial of sexual intercourse amounts to cruelty. JUDGEMENT   1. What is the meaning and import of the expression ‘cruelty’ as a matrimonial offence is the core question on the determination of which […]

Read More