A woman lawyer caused a major disturbance in the Supreme Court Today (Dec 3rd) after refusing to leave the courtroom despite repeated directions from the Chief Justice of India. She kept insisting her friend’s murder case was mishandled, leading to her being escorted out.
Woman Lawyer Creates Chaos Inside Supreme Court: A surprising scene unfolded in the Supreme Court of India when a woman lawyer created a disturbance during the hearing before the bench headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant. The lawyer refused to leave the courtroom even after the CJI repeatedly asked her to step back and follow proper legal procedure.
The incident started when the woman lawyer made an out-of-list oral mention before the bench. She claimed that her close friend—whom she described as a brother—had been murdered in a guest house in Delhi when she was in Mumbai. She also alleged that the police officer who earlier refused to register her FIR had now been made the investigating officer in the same murder case. According to her, this raised serious doubts about the fairness of the probe.
While she was narrating her allegations emotionally, the CJI stopped her and advised her to file a proper petition so that the Court could examine the matter formally.
In response, the lawyer said:
“I’m in depression, I will do that ….”
The Chief Justice then suggested that another advocate from the bar could help her prepare the required documents and take necessary legal steps.
Even after the bench called out the next case, the woman lawyer continued to argue. When the women Court Marshals approached her to escort her out, she raised her voice and shouted:
“Don’t misbehave, don’t touch me.”
The lawyer kept speaking loudly, ignoring repeated requests from the judges. At one point, Justice Ujjal Bhuyan directed her attention by saying,
“Listen to what the Chief Justice is saying.”
But she remained firm and continued to express fear for her safety, repeatedly stating that she only wanted to
“Put it in the ears of this court.”
Another woman advocate present in the courtroom tried to calm her down and reminded her about basic courtroom discipline, especially since she herself is a lawyer. The woman immediately snapped back and said:
“Don’t speak to me like that,”
while continuing to raise her voice. Due to the increasing commotion, the Court proceedings were muted for some time.
Finally, after several minutes of protest and refusal to follow directions, the woman lawyer was escorted out of the courtroom by security staff.
This unusual incident drew attention across legal circles, as disruptions of this kind inside the Chief Justice’s Court are extremely rare. The Supreme Court is now expected to look into the procedural steps related to the case once a proper petition is filed.
Explanatory Table Of All Laws / Sections Involved
| Legal Concept | Meaning / Explanation in Simple Indian English | Why It Is Relevant Here |
| Oral Mention (Out-of-List Mention) | When a lawyer speaks directly to the bench asking for urgent hearing even though the matter is not listed in the day’s cause-list. | The woman lawyer made an out-of-list oral mention before the CJI. |
| FIR (First Information Report) | First step of criminal procedure. Police record complaint of a cognizable offence. | She said police earlier refused to register her FIR about murder. |
| Murder Case (Section 302 IPC) | Killing of a person with intention/knowledge. Punishment: life imprisonment or death penalty. | Her allegation was that her “brother-like” friend was murdered in a Delhi guest house. |
| Investigating Officer (IO) | Police officer in charge of investigating a case. | She claimed the same officer who refused her FIR is now IO, raising doubts about fairness. |
| Court Marshals / Security Staff | Court personnel responsible for maintaining discipline. | They were asked to escort her out when she refused to obey the Court. |
| Drafting a Petition | Formal written application to the court with facts, grounds, prayers. | CJI asked her to file a proper petition instead of shouting orally. |
| Court Decorum / Contempt Risk | Expected respectful behaviour inside court. Disruptions can lead to contempt. | Her shouting and refusing to leave breached courtroom discipline. |
Bench: Chief Justice of India Surya Kant & Justice Ujjal Bhuyan This was the CJI Court (Court No. 1).
Summary Of The Incident
- A woman lawyer suddenly made an out-of-list oral mention.
- She said her close friend (whom she calls brother) was murdered in a Delhi guest house.
- She said she was in Mumbai when it happened.
- She alleged police refused to register her FIR.
- She said the same police officer now became the IO of the murder case.
- CJI Surya Kant told her to file a proper petition.
- She responded: ” Im in depression, I will do that ….”
- CJI suggested some other advocate could help her.
- Court called the next item but she kept arguing.
- Court Marshal (women staff) approached her to escort her.
- She yelled: “Don’t misbehave, don’t touch me.”
- Justice Bhuyan told her: “Listen to what the Chief Justice is saying.”
- She said she only wants to “put it in the ears of this court.”
- Another woman advocate asked her to maintain decorum.
- She replied: “Don’t speak to me like that.”
- Proceedings were muted because she kept shouting.
- She was finally escorted out.
Key Takeaways
- Even officers who refuse to file an FIR can conveniently become investigating officers, showing how easily police discretion can be misused.
- The Supreme Court had to remind a lawyer about basic procedure, proving how emotional appeals often override legal discipline in our system.
- Repeated disruptions forced the CJI Bench to mute proceedings, showing how courtroom decorum collapses when rules are applied selectively.
- The incident highlights how personal narratives are pushed without proper petitions, while genuine male victims struggle for basic hearings.
- The chaos shows the urgent need for consistent standards in law and order, because selective sensitivity destroys fairness for everyone—especially men fighting real battles.
This Could Change Your Case-Get FREE Legal Advice-Click Here!
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the Indian courts and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of “ShoneeKapoor.com” or its affiliates. This article is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content provided is not legal advice, and viewers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. Viewer discretion is advised.