A legal dispute between Sapna Choudhary and husband Yashveer Sahu has reached court, with interim protection granted to the singer and a restraining order issued against her husband.
NEW DELHI: Popular Haryanvi singer and former Bigg Boss contestant Sapna Choudhary has received interim protection from a Delhi court in a domestic violence case filed against her husband, Yashveer Sahu. The relief was granted under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act after Sapna approached the Mahila Court alleging that she had faced repeated physical abuse and disturbances caused by her husband.
According to the case presented before the court, Sapna alleged that her husband had assaulted her on several occasions and had also created problems in public places. She informed the court that she had already moved out of their shared residence and had initiated legal proceedings seeking protection and other reliefs.
The matter was heard by Judicial Magistrate Nidhi Singh. Sapna, through her counsel Advocate Preeti Singh, sought urgent protection ahead of the premiere of her upcoming film. She expressed concerns about her personal safety and the possibility of disruption to her professional commitments.
After examining the petition, affidavit, photographs of alleged injuries, and electronic evidence placed on record, the court found sufficient grounds at the preliminary stage to grant interim relief and issue summons in the matter.
In its order, the court stated:
“Respondent (Choudhary’s husband) is restrained from approaching the petitioner in any manner till the next date of hearing. Respondent is restrained from contacting the petitioner in any manner or visiting her place of residence or work and committing any act of domestic violence till the NDOH (next date of hearing).”
The court also took note of the submissions that denial of immediate protection could expose Sapna to irreparable harm, affect her dignity and safety, and interfere with her professional engagements, including her appearance at the film premiere.
To ensure compliance with its directions, the court instructed the Protection Officer and the concerned Station House Officer (SHO) to provide necessary assistance and ensure that the order is followed.
Sapna Choudhary and Yashveer Sahu got married in 2020 after being in a relationship for around four years. The couple has two sons. Their first son, Porus, was born in 2020, while their second son, Shahbir, was born in 2024.
The case will now be heard again on July 25, 2026, when the court will consider the matter further and hear the response of the respondent.
EXPLANATORY TABLE: LAWS & PROVISIONS INVOLVED
| Law / Provision | Purpose | Relevance in This Case |
| Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 | Provides legal protection to women facing physical, emotional, verbal, sexual, or economic abuse within a domestic relationship | Sapna Choudhary filed her complaint under this Act alleging domestic violence by her husband |
| Interim Protection Order | Temporary relief granted before final adjudication to prevent further harm | The court restrained the husband from contacting or approaching Sapna until the next hearing |
| Protection Officer Provisions under DV Act | Protection Officers assist victims and ensure implementation of court orders | The court directed the Protection Officer to assist Sapna and ensure compliance |
| Residence and Protection Reliefs under DV Act | Enables courts to protect an aggrieved person from harassment, violence, or interference | The husband was restrained from visiting Sapna’s residence and workplace |
CASE DETAILS
- Case Title: Sapna Choudhary v. Veer Sahu
- Court: Dwarka Mahila Court, New Delhi
- Judge: Judicial Magistrate Nidhi Singh
- Petitioner’s Counsel: Advocate Preeti Singh
- Next Date Of Hearing: July 25, 2026.
- Nature of Case: Proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- Interim protection orders are often granted at the initial stage based on the complainant’s allegations and supporting material, before the respondent’s side is fully heard.
- Restraining orders can immediately impact a person’s access to their spouse, home, and family life even before the case reaches trial.
- Allegations alone do not determine guilt; the claims will still need to be tested through due process and evidence.
- Domestic violence laws must protect genuine victims, but courts must also ensure safeguards against misuse and false allegations.
- This case highlights the importance of maintaining a balance between providing urgent protection and preserving the legal rights of the accused.
This Could Change Your Case-Get FREE Legal Advice-Click Here!
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the Indian courts and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of “ShoneeKapoor.com” or its affiliates. This article is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content provided is not legal advice, and viewers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. Viewer discretion is advised.