{"id":8402,"date":"2026-06-17T10:59:53","date_gmt":"2026-06-17T05:29:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/?p=8402"},"modified":"2026-06-17T10:53:22","modified_gmt":"2026-06-17T05:23:22","slug":"twisha-sharma-custody-extended","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/twisha-sharma-custody-extended\/","title":{"rendered":"Twisha Sharma Case: Custody Of Husband, Ex-Judge Giribala Singh Extended Till June 30 Amid Media Outrage"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-medium-font-size\">The Twisha Sharma case took another dramatic turn after the court extended custody till June 30, with the second post-mortem report emerging as the investigation&#8217;s most important missing piece.<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>MADHYA PRADESH: <\/em>The investigation into the death of actress-model Twisha Sharma took another important turn after a Bhopal court <strong>extended the judicial custody<\/strong> of her husband, Samarth Singh, and mother-in-law, retired judge Giribala Singh, <strong>till June 30<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Both accused appeared before the court <strong>through video conferencing from Central Jail<\/strong>. The <a href=\"https:\/\/cbi.gov.in\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">CBI <\/a>sought more time, stating that the investigation is not yet complete and that an important forensic report is still awaited.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">During the hearing, Giribala Singh raised several concerns about her stay inside jail. She informed the court that newspapers supplied to inmates allegedly had reports related to her case removed before distribution. She <strong>requested permission to access complete and unedited newspapers<\/strong> so that she could read the full coverage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">She also requested <strong>relaxation in the jail rules related to lawyer meetings<\/strong>. According to her, the existing 20-minute limit was not enough considering the complexity of the case. She further sought <strong>permission to meet her lawyers jointly with her son<\/strong>, Samarth Singh, so that they could discuss and prepare their legal defence together.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another issue raised by Giribala Singh was related to the investigation. She informed the court that medicines belonging to Twisha Sharma had been seized during the probe, but neither she nor Samarth&#8217;s legal team had been provided with a <strong>copy of the seizure memo<\/strong>. The defence requested that the document be supplied to them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court clarified that all facilities inside the jail would be governed strictly according to the <strong>jail manual<\/strong> and <strong>no special treatment<\/strong> could be given outside those rules. However, the court directed that the seizure memo relating to Twisha Sharma&#8217;s belongings be provided to the defence counsel. It also ordered that a copy of the CBI&#8217;s application seeking extension of judicial custody be handed over to the lawyers representing the accused.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The hearing also saw objections from Giribala Singh and her legal team regarding <strong>media coverage<\/strong> of the case. They argued that statements being made publicly by Twisha Sharma&#8217;s family members and their lawyers were creating a parallel narrative outside the courtroom. The defence requested that steps be taken to <strong>prevent public discussions<\/strong> that could influence the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Representatives of the CBI, lawyers for both sides, and members of Twisha Sharma&#8217;s family were present during the proceedings. Twisha&#8217;s father, Navnidhi Sharma, and her brother, Major Harshit Sharma, also attended the hearing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Speaking to reporters outside the court, Navnidhi Sharma said that he had complete faith in the CBI investigation and believed that the truth would come out through the legal process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the most crucial developments in the case is still pending. According to Shubhang Dixit, counsel representing Twisha Sharma&#8217;s family, the CBI informed the court that it is still waiting for the <strong>second post-mortem report<\/strong>. This report is expected to play a major role in deciding the future direction of the investigation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Citing the incomplete investigation and pending forensic findings, the CBI requested an <strong>extension of judicial custody for both accused<\/strong>. The court accepted the request and extended their custody till June 30.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Meanwhile, the matter has also expanded beyond the criminal investigation. Twisha Sharma&#8217;s father has approached the <strong>Madhya Pradesh State Legal Services Authority<\/strong> and raised concerns regarding the role of certain legal aid lawyers allegedly connected with the defence, despite the accused already having private legal representation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As the country awaits the second post-mortem report, all eyes remain on the findings that could shape the next phase of this <strong>high-profile investigation<\/strong> and determine the future course of the Twisha Sharma death case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">EXPLANATORY TABLE: LAWS AND LEGAL PROVISIONS INVOLVED<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><td><strong>Law \/ Provision<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Purpose<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>How It Applied in This Case<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Judicial Custody under <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/?s=Bharatiya+Nagarik+Suraksha+Sanhita\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">BNSS<\/a>\/CrPC<\/strong><\/td><td>Allows accused persons to remain in jail during investigation upon court approval<\/td><td>The court extended the judicial custody of Samarth Singh and Giribala Singh till June 30.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Extension of Judicial Custody<\/strong><\/td><td>Investigating agency can seek additional custody if investigation is incomplete<\/td><td>The CBI sought extension citing pending forensic evidence and incomplete probe.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Jail Manual Provisions<\/strong><\/td><td>Regulates facilities available to prisoners, including meetings and access<\/td><td>The court held that all jail facilities would be governed strictly by the jail manual.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Right to Legal Consultation<\/strong><\/td><td>Accused persons have the right to consult advocates subject to prison regulations<\/td><td>Giribala Singh sought relaxation of the 20-minute meeting limit and joint meetings with Samarth Singh.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Seizure Memo (BNSS\/CrPC Procedure)<\/strong><\/td><td>Documents articles seized during investigation<\/td><td>The court directed that the seizure memo relating to Twisha Sharma&#8217;s medicines and belongings be supplied to the defence.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Supply of Investigation Documents<\/strong><\/td><td>Ensures fair opportunity to the accused during proceedings<\/td><td>The court ordered that the CBI&#8217;s application seeking custody extension be provided to the defence lawyers.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Forensic Evidence and Post-Mortem Reports<\/strong><\/td><td>Scientific evidence forming part of investigation<\/td><td>The second post-mortem report remains pending and is considered crucial by the CBI.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987<\/strong><\/td><td>Governs legal aid services and appointment of legal aid counsel<\/td><td>Twisha Sharma&#8217;s father approached the State Legal Services Authority regarding alleged involvement of certain legal aid lawyers.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">CASE DETAILS<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Case Title: <\/strong>CBI v. Samarth Singh &amp; Giribala Singh<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Court: <\/strong>Bhopal District Court, Madhya Pradesh<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Nature of Proceedings: <\/strong>Extension of judicial custody<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Date of Order: <\/strong>June 16, 2026<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Custody Extended Till: <\/strong>June 30, 2026<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Counsel for Twisha Sharma&#8217;s Family: <\/strong>Advocate Shubhang Dixit<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">KEY TAKEAWAYS<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Even in a high-profile case, courts cannot deny the accused their basic legal rights, including access to documents and proper legal consultation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Media narratives cannot replace evidence. The second post-mortem report may ultimately carry more weight than public opinion.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Judicial custody is not proof of guilt. An accused remains innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The court refused special treatment but ensured procedural fairness by directing that important investigation documents be supplied to the defence.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Emotionally charged allegations must be tested through due process, forensic evidence, and a fair trial rather than trial by media.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading has-text-align-center has-black-color has-very-light-gray-to-cyan-bluish-gray-gradient-background has-text-color has-background has-link-color has-medium-font-size wp-elements-ddcd2fca7ebd31d178a8aa48d940196c\" id=\"this-could-change-your-case-get-free-legal-advice-click-here\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/contact-me\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">This Could Change Your Case-Get FREE Legal Advice-Click Here!<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><br><strong>Disclaimer<\/strong>: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the Indian courts and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ShoneeKapoor.com<\/a>\u201d or its affiliates. This article is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content provided is not legal advice, and viewers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. Viewer discretion is advised.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Twisha Sharma case took another dramatic turn after the court extended custody till June 30, with the second post-mortem report emerging as the investigation&#8217;s most important missing piece. MADHYA PRADESH: The investigation into the death of actress-model Twisha Sharma took another important turn after a Bhopal court extended the judicial custody of her husband,&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":8404,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[115,118],"tags":[2004,2705,2697,2704,2703,2699,2708,2698,2702,1836,2706,2051,2707,2700,2701,2696,2709],"class_list":["post-8402","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-latest-news","category-legal-update","tag-bhopal-court","tag-bnss-procedure","tag-cbi-investigation","tag-criminal-investigation-india","tag-forensic-evidence","tag-giribala-singh","tag-high-profile-criminal-case","tag-judicial-custody","tag-judicial-custody-extension","tag-letest-news","tag-media-trial-debate","tag-news-highlights-today","tag-right-to-legal-defence","tag-samarth-singh","tag-second-post-mortem-report","tag-twisha-sharma-case","tag-twisha-sharma-death-investigation"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8402","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8402"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8402\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8405,"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8402\/revisions\/8405"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8404"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8402"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8402"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8402"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}