{"id":2664,"date":"2025-12-13T12:52:42","date_gmt":"2025-12-13T07:22:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/?p=2664"},"modified":"2025-12-13T12:18:33","modified_gmt":"2025-12-13T06:48:33","slug":"wife-demanding-alimony-in-divorce","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wife-demanding-alimony-in-divorce\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Praises Wife For Not Demanding Alimony In Divorce Settlement: \u201cRare Nowadays\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-medium-font-size\">The Supreme Court granted mutual consent divorce while appreciating a woman for not demanding alimony or any financial benefit. The Court called such settlements \u201crare nowadays\u201d and praised her gesture as uncommon in today\u2019s times.<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><em>NEW DELHI<\/em>: The <strong>Supreme Court of India<\/strong> granted a <a href=\"https:\/\/sahodar.in\/divorce-by-mutual-consent\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><strong>divorce<\/strong> by <strong>mutual consent<\/strong><\/a> in a case that stood out for an unusual reason. The <strong>Court appreciated a woman for not demanding <a href=\"https:\/\/sahodar.in\/what-are-the-legal-consequences-for-non-payment-of-alimony-in-india\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">alimony<\/a>, maintenance, or financial claim from her husband<\/strong> while settling the matrimonial dispute. Such conduct, the Court noted, is rarely seen in present times.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A Bench comprising <strong>Justice JB Pardiwala<\/strong> and <strong>Justice KV Viswanathan<\/strong> recorded that both parties had willingly agreed to the terms of settlement. While taking note of the agreement, the Bench described the matter as \u201c<strong><em>one of the rare<\/em><\/strong>\u201d cases where the wife chose not to claim anything from the husband during divorce proceedings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Earlier, when the couple had approached the Supreme Court, the Bench had advised them to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement through mediation. Acting on this suggestion, the parties approached the <strong>Supreme Court <a href=\"https:\/\/sahodar.in\/what-is-mediation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Mediation Centre<\/a><\/strong> to resolve their differences peacefully.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The mediation process proved successful. The Court was later informed that the dispute had been resolved amicably and that, as part of the settlement, the <strong>wife had even returned the gold bangles that were given to her at the time of marriage<\/strong>. These bangles originally belonged to the husband\u2019s mother, and their return was considered a significant gesture by the Court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While passing the order, the Bench observed:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><strong><em>\u201cThis is one of the rare settlements we have come across over a period of time wherein nothing has been demanded by the wife from the husband.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>The Supreme Court further acknowledged and appreciated the conduct of the woman, highlighting <strong>how uncommon such gestures have become in matrimonial disputes today<\/strong>. The Bench stated:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><strong><em>\u201cWe appreciate this kind gesture which is very rare to be seen nowadays,\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>while exercising its extraordinary powers under <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/sahodar.in\/article-142-of-the-constitution-of-india\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Article 142 of the Constitution<\/a><\/strong> to dissolve the marriage and grant complete justice to both parties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Before concluding the proceedings, the <strong>Bench addressed the wife directly in open court<\/strong>. The judges encouraged her to move ahead in life with positivity and without carrying the burden of the past.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Court remarked:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><strong><em>\u201cThis is one of the rare cases we have come across where there is no exchange of anything. We appreciate this. Go ahead in life. Forget the past. Live a happy life. Wish you the best.\u201d<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>This judgment has drawn attention for highlighting a <strong>rare instance of a <a href=\"https:\/\/sahodar.in\/fir-quashed-against-husband-wife-pays-rs-12-lakh-under-divorce-settlement\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">divorce settlement<\/a> without financial demands<\/strong>, reinforcing the value of mutual understanding and peaceful resolution in matrimonial disputes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Laws and Sections Involved \u2013 Explanatory Table<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><td><strong>Law \/ Provision<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>What It Means in Simple Terms<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>How It Was Used in This Case<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td><strong>Article 142 of the Constitution of India<\/strong><\/td><td>This article gives the Supreme Court special power to pass any order necessary to do complete justice between parties, even if strict legal procedures might otherwise delay relief<\/td><td>The Supreme Court used Article 142 to directly dissolve the marriage after noting that both parties had settled all issues amicably and nothing further survived between them<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Case Summary<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Supreme Court of India<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Bench:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/?s=Justice+JB+Pardiwala\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Justice JB Pardiwala<\/a> &amp; Justice KV Viswanathan<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Nature of Case:<\/strong> Divorce by mutual consent<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Counsels and Mediator<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Counsel for Wife:<\/strong> Advocate Vrinda Bhandari<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Counsel for Husband:<\/strong> Advocate Sagar Pahune Patil<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Mediator:<\/strong> Advocate Yugandhara Pawar Jha (Supreme Court Mediation Centre)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Key Takeaways<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The Supreme Court itself called this case \u201c<strong><em>rare<\/em><\/strong>\u201d, clearly showing that <strong>zero-alimony<\/strong> settlements are an exception, not the norm, in <strong>Indian divorce litigation<\/strong>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>This order exposes how <strong>financial claims have become routine in <a href=\"https:\/\/sahodar.in\/impact-of-matrimonial-disputes-on-children\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">matrimonial disputes<\/a><\/strong>, even when marriages end by mutual consent.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The Court\u2019s appreciation proves that <strong>law does not mandate alimony in every case<\/strong>; it depends on conduct, consent, and genuine need.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>By using Article 142, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that <strong>peaceful settlement without monetary extraction deserves encouragement<\/strong>, not suspicion.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>This case strengthens the <strong>demand for gender-neutral divorce and <a href=\"https:\/\/sahodar.in\/who-is-eligible-to-claim-maintenance-under-section-125\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">maintenance laws<\/a><\/strong> where men are not treated as default financial providers.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading has-text-align-center has-black-color has-very-light-gray-to-cyan-bluish-gray-gradient-background has-text-color has-background has-link-color has-medium-font-size wp-elements-813e64ecd8d0f9bce1baef850ed90f9c\"><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/contact-me\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">This Could Change Your Case-Get FREE Legal Advice-Click Here!<\/a><\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Disclaimer:<\/strong>&nbsp;The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the Indian courts and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of \u201cShoneeKapoor.com\u201d or its affiliates. This article is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content provided is not legal advice, and viewers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel. Viewer discretion is advised.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Praises Wife For Not Demanding Alimony In Divorce Settlement<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2671,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[117,115],"tags":[161,367,159,188,162,766,765,140,176,170,165,132],"class_list":["post-2664","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-supreme-court","category-latest-news","tag-alimony","tag-article-142-constitution-of-india","tag-divorce","tag-divorce-petition","tag-divorce-settlement","tag-justice-jb-pardiwala","tag-justice-kv-viswanathan","tag-maintenance","tag-marriage","tag-matrimonial-disputes","tag-mutual-consent-divorce","tag-supreme-court"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2664","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2664"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2664\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5023,"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2664\/revisions\/5023"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2671"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2664"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2664"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.shoneekapoor.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2664"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}